Report Outline
- Section 1: Key Findings
- Section 1A: Supporting Visualizations and Quotes
- Section 2: Data Analysis Overview
- Section 2A: Data Wrangling
- Section 2B: Data Cleaning
- Section 3: Data Analysis by Survey Question
- Section 3A: Demographic Information
- Section 3B: General sentiment
- Section 3C: Economic Benefit
- Section 3D: Community Impact
- Section 3E: Analysis on surrounding questions
- Section 3F: marginal analysis on fundraising questions
Section 1: Key Findings
- 100% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the ToolBank positively impacts their CBO
- 100% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the ToolBank reduced costs related to purchasing and renting tools and equipment
- 86% of the survey respondents reported to at least of the minority service or leadership criteria.
- Events got impacted by the TB mainly through their quality (77.8%), consistency (66.7%), and quantity (55.6%)
- The most prominent types of events the toolbank supports are community building (84.4%) and service projects (75.6%)
For the past year, - half of the respondents reported that at least 1/3 (35%) of their events would have been impossible without the help of the TB - half of the respondents reported that at least 150 of their constituents (volunteers, members, and event attendees) would have been negatively impacted without the help of the TB.
Section 1A: Supporting Visualizations and Quotes
TBD
Section 2: Data Analysis Process
Section 2A: Data Wrangling
Reading data with the googlesheets4 package
Reading gross receipts data
Section 2B: Data Cleaning
change column names to variables
change multiple choice answer into numbers
split check all that apply responses into indicators
Merge Gross Recipts to datasheet and add stratification
Section 3: Data Analysis by Survey Question
Section 3B: General sentiment
Response analysis
overall table:
|
Number, percentages of respondants to sentiment questions
|
|
|
#Strongly Agree (%)
|
#Agree (%)
|
#Neutral (%)
|
#Disagree (%)
|
#Strongly Disagree (%)
|
#N/A (%)
|
|
TB has pos. impacted our CBO by reducing costs related to purchasing or renting tools and equipment
|
42 (93.3%)
|
3 (6.7%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
|
TB has pos. impacted our CBO by reducing costs related to storing tools and equipment
|
26 (57.8%)
|
7 (15.6%)
|
7 (15.6%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
5 (11.1%)
|
|
TB has pos. impacted our CBO by reducing staff time to complete maintenance/projects
|
19 (42.2%)
|
11 (24.4%)
|
8 (17.8%)
|
2 (4.4%)
|
0 (0%)
|
5 (11.1%)
|
|
the Tools made available through the TB allow our CBO to complete higher quality events/projects without additional funding
|
36 (80%)
|
7 (15.6%)
|
2 (4.4%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
|
TB has pos. impacted our CBO
|
42 (93.3%)
|
3 (6.7%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
Plots

Section 3C: Economic Benefit
Response analysis
Question: How much would you have spent on maintenance of tools and equipment had the TB not existed?

Question: Reflecting on your events in the past year: If the TB did not exist, how much funding would your organization allocate to buying, storing, tracking and maintaining your own inventory of tools and equipment?

Question: number of total events hosted during last year
Measure.of.events.hosted.in.past.year Value
1 Mean 17.55556
2 Median 6.00000
3 Mode 3.00000
4 sd 25.65466
5 1st quantile 4.00000
6 3rd quantile 20.00000

Question: If there were no TB, how many of your events in the past year would you not have been hosted for any reason?

Questions: If there were no TB, how many of your constituents, including volunteers, members, and event attendees, would have been negatively impacted in the past year?

overall summary table:
|
Impact on CBO if TB did not exist
|
|
|
Mean
|
25th quantile
|
Median
|
Mode
|
75th quantile
|
Standard deviation
|
|
Money That Would Have Been Spent if TB Did Not Exist*
|
|
  on Purchasing or renting tools and equipment
|
5029
|
500
|
2000
|
2000
|
3500
|
14109
|
|
  on storage of tools and equipment
|
926
|
0
|
500
|
0
|
1200
|
1196
|
|
  on maintenance of tools and equipment
|
817
|
80
|
300
|
500
|
500
|
2227
|
|
  on buying, storing, tracking and maintaining own tool+equiptment inventory in past year
|
2527
|
800
|
1500
|
5000
|
3000
|
2532
|
|
# Events/People Impacted If TB Did Not Exist
|
|
  # events that would have been impossible in past year
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
5
|
16
|
|
  % of CBO’s total events that would have been impossible in past year
|
41
|
4
|
35
|
0
|
62
|
36
|
|
  # constituents that would have been negatively impacted in the past year
|
1306
|
75
|
150
|
100
|
500
|
3078
|
|
*in US dollars
|
Section 3E: Analysis surrounding questions
Question: What is the relationship like between minority-led CBOs and the toolbank compared to non-minority led CBOs?
Section 3F: marginal analysis on fundraising questions
|
% of event expense budget saved by using TB equipment at event?
|
|
|
Responses (in US dollars)
|
|
Mean
|
32.8
|
|
25th percentile
|
10
|
|
Median
|
30
|
|
75th percentile
|
50
|
|
standard deviation
|
28.8
|
|
# respondants
|
45
|